Which two statements best define the relationship between a parent case and a child case?

The choice that states a case represents the complete processing of a transaction while a child case supports that is accurate because it highlights the hierarchical relationship that exists between parent and child cases in case management. In this context, the parent case acts as the overarching structure, managing the overall transaction or process. It encompasses the broader objectives and workflows, while the child case deals with specific sub-tasks or elements that are part of completing the parent case's goals.

This relationship allows for the efficient organization of work, as child cases can be created to address particular requirements or tasks that support the main objectives set by the parent case. By breaking down complex transactions into manageable child cases, teams can work on different aspects simultaneously, leading to increased productivity and better resource management.

In contrast, other options may suggest similar themes but do not capture the essence of how child cases function in relation to their parent cases. For instance, claiming that a case is all-encompassing while a child case focuses on sub-tasks does not fully explain how the transactions relate to each other in a supportive manner. The idea that a case and child case can represent the same transaction lacks the nuanced understanding of their defined roles. Lastly, mentioning that a child case contains the same data context as its parent